In Plato's mind, the body is an anchor which holds the soul from enlightenment. That which we know (as we will discuss later) we knew before we had the body and it is only recollection of this knowledge that allows us to know anything while we are in the body.
We will now discuss the application of this idea of Forms and the separation of the same from sensible particulars by discussing Plato's idea of "Two Worlds," or being and partaking. Being does not mean the same thing as partaking is not explained by and does not explain its essence. In fact, Plato postulated that is X lacks essence, it can fail to be. An example given is that of beauty. Beauty is beautiful, and other things become beautiful by partaking in what is beautiful. The question then comes whether the partaking is then dependent on the being. In what Plato uses as demonstration of the immortal soul, when being is confronted with its opposite, the being must then withdraw or die. If the beings do withdraw and exist apart from the forms, then the individuality then exists by particulars, which Plato believed were separate from forms.
In moving from the metaphysical to the epistemological, we understand that Plato believed that knowledge exists, and attempts to determine what makes knowledge possible. To Plato, Forms are knowledge. Souls are knowledge. If so, and if Forms do not exist within the physical world, then is it possible that knowledge also does not exist within the physical world? Plato, in Republic opines that Forms are related to one another, and this knowledge is therefore proof of existence. If knowledge is proof of existence, then knowledge must be instinctive and innate (one cannot be without knowing) but this knowledge is deep seated and not necessarily immediately recalled. Plato theorized that knowledge was present before...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now